CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Data Visualization and AnalyticsUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

User-Centered Evaluation of Information Visualization Techniques: Making the HCI-InfoVis Connection Explicit

Freitas, Carla M. D. S., Pimenta, Marcelo S., Scapin, Dominique L.·2014·Handbook of Human Centric Visualization
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant challenges remain in conducting truly user-centered usability assessments for XAI-CDSS despite comprehensive evaluation guidelines.

    “Despite the existence of comprehensive evaluation guidelines (e.g., those by Freitas et al. [81] for visualization), significant challenges remain in conducting truly user-centered usability assessments for XAI-CDSS.”

    From Explainable AI for Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review, Key Gaps, and Research Synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 28

Authors
Freitas, C. M. D. S., Pimenta, M. S., & Scapin, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Corresponding author
Freitas, Carla M. D. S.
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Human Centric Visualization
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2013-06-25
Pages
315-336
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_12
OpenAlex
W166454861
Cited by
28
References
80
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
information visualization, usability evaluation, user-centered evaluation, human-computer interaction, user experience, evaluation guidelines, human factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review