Assessment of Executive Functioning Using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BRIEF-A is a norm-referenced, self-report scale of EF with T-scores ≥65 indicating clinically significant impairment for indices and composite scores.
“The BRIEF-A is a norm-referenced, self-report scale of EF with T-scores ≥65 indicating clinically significant impairment for indices and composite scores (22, 23).”
From Characteristics of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among adults with ADHD: objective neurocognitive measures align with self-report of executive function (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 202 · Cited by 188
- Authors
- Roth, R. M., Isquith, P. K., & Gioia, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- ORCID
- Roth, Robert M.
- Venue
- Handbook of Executive Functioning
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2013-09-12
- Pages
- 301-331
- OpenAlex
- W187209040
- Semantic Scholar
- 249835fd60f1b294e0d2202101690a979dfff571
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 202
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 28.86
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, executive function, self-regulation, children, adolescents, parent and teacher ratings, informant discrepancies, daily functioning, rating scales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
