The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of the Computational Power of Sigmoid and Boolean Threshold Circuits
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While the original theorems showed that two layers were sufficient for universal function approximation, deeper networks can be more powerful and more efficient than shallower networks with the same number of parameters [57][58][59].”
From Continuous-variable quantum neural networks (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- W.J. Bultman, “Topics in the Theory of Machine Learning and Neural Computing”, Ph.D Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1991.
- B. DasGupta and G. Schnitger, “The power of Approximating: a Comparison of Activation Functions”, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, S.E. Hanson, J.D. Cowan and C.L. Giles eds, pp. 615–622, 1993.
- J. Hertz, A. Krogh and R.G. Palmer, “Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation”, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1991.
- A. Hajnal, W. Maass, P. Pudlak, M. Szegedy and G. Turan, “Threshold Circuits of Bounded Depth”, Proc. of the 28th Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 99–110, 1987. To appear in J. Comp. Syst. Sci.. · DOI
- C.C. Klimasauskas, “The 1989 Neuro-Computing Bibliography”, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1989.
- W. Maass, “Bounds for the computational power and learning complexity of analog neural nets”, Proc. of the 25th ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, 1993, 335–344. · DOI
- W. Maass, G. Schnitger, E. D. Sontag, “On the computational power of sigmoid versus boolean threshold circuits”, Proc. of the 32nd Annual IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 1991, 767–776 · DOI
- W. Maass and G. Turan, “How Fast Can a Threshold Gate Learn?”, in: Computational Learning Theory and Natural Learning Systems: Constraints and Prospects, G. Drastal, S.J. Hanson and R. Rivest eds., MIT Press, to appear.
- S. Muroga, “Threshold Logic and its Applications”, Wiley, New York, 1971.
- E.L. Schwartz, “Computational Neuroscience”, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.
- E.D. Sontag, “Feedforward Nets for Interpolation and Classification”, J. Comp. Syst. Sci., 45, 1992, 20–48. · DOI
- E.D. Sontag and H.J. Sussmann, “Backpropagation can give rise to spurious local minima even for networks without hidden layers”, Complex Systems 3, pp. 91–106, 1989.
- E.D. Sontag and H.J. Sussmann, “Backpropagation separates where Perceptrons do”, Neural Networks, 4, pp. 243–249, 1991. · DOI
- S.M. Weiss, C.A. Kulikowsky, “Computer Systems that Learn”, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 1991.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Continuous-variable quantum neural networks
Killoran, N., Bromley, T. R., Arrazola, J. M., Schuld, M., Quesada, N., & Lloyd, S. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033063 · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Maass, W., Schnitger, G., & Sontag, E. D.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Paderborn University (DE)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Theoretical Advances in Neural Computation and Learning
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 127-151
- OpenAlex
- W1484418787
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › DNA and Biological Computing
- Keywords
- computational power, artificial neural networks, massively parallel computing, threshold functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review