Cited by 46Behavioral Health and InterventionsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The Construct of Goal Commitment: Measurement And Relationships with Task Performance

Seijts, Gerard H., Latham, Gary P.·2000·Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-4397-8_14

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2000
Pages
315-332
OpenAlex
W195569919
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
goal commitment, goal difficulty, task performance, goal specificity, goal setting, performance measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review