The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecology of Microbial Cellulose Degradation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production of cellulolytic enzymes by Fusarium species
Trivedi, L. S., & Rao, K. K. (1981) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/bf00127395 · Cited by 12
Cited by
Hobley, L., Harkins, C., MacPhee, C. E., & Stanley-Wall, N. R. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv015 · Cited by 581
“Cellulose is one of the most abundant organic polymers in nature (Ljungdahl and Eriksson 1985).”
BackgroundThe cellulosome — A treasure-trove for biotechnology
Bayer, E. A., Morag, E., & Lamed, R. (1994) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6 · Cited by 466
Eiland, F., Klamer, M., Lind, A.-M., Leth, M., & Bååth, E. (2001) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002480000071 · Cited by 302
A Life with Acetogens, Thermophiles, and Cellulolytic Anaerobes
Ljungdahl, L. G. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073617 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljungdahl, L. G., & Eriksson, K.-E.
- Venue
- Advances in Microbial Ecology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1985
- Pages
- 237-299
- ISSN
- 0147-4863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W119230793
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecology of Microbial Cellulose Degradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4615-9412-3_6
- The paper
- Ljungdahl, L. G., & Eriksson, K.-E. (1985). Ecology of Microbial Cellulose Degradation. Advances in Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9412-3_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
