The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity
Open accessAbstract
Perhaps one of the most striking differences between a brain and today’s computers is the amount of “wiring.” In a digital computer the ratio of connections to components is about 3, whereas for the mammalian cortex it lies between 10 and 10,000 (1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules
Eigen, M. (1971) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00623322 · Cited by 3,788
Cited by
Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness
Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03200760 · Cited by 658
Metadata
- Authors
- Marr, D., & Poggio, T.
- Venue
- From the Retina to the Neocortex
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Boston
- Published
- 1976
- Pages
- 239-243
- OpenAlex
- W2048330959
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4684-6775-8_9
- The paper
- Marr, D., & Poggio, T. (1976). Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity. From the Retina to the Neocortex. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6775-8_9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
