The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of NBS Cryogenic Flow Research Facility
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most cryogenic flowmeters can be calibrated to an uncertainty of ±0.5% for volume flow and ±0.2% for mass flow in this facility (Brennan, et al., 1972).”
From CRYOGENIC MEASUREMENTS (2016) · cites this paper as Brennan, et al., 1972
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- J. W. Dean, J. A. Brennan, and D. B. Mann, in: Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 14, Springer Science+Business Media New York (1969), p. 299. · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0549-2_37
Cited by
Radebaugh, R. (2016) · Handbook of Measurement in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1002/9781119244752.ch61 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Brennan, J. A., Mann, D. B., Dean, J. W., & Kneebone, C. H.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- Venue
- Advances in Cryogenic Engineering
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1972
- Pages
- 199-205
- OpenAlex
- W79711671
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Flow Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Keywords
- cryogenic flow measurement, measurement uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of NBS Cryogenic Flow Research Facility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4684-7826-6_22
- The paper
- Brennan, J. A., Mann, D. B., Dean, J. W., & Kneebone, C. H. (1972). Performance of NBS Cryogenic Flow Research Facility. Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7826-6_22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.