Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lateral prefrontal cortex has been particularly implicated in the support of cognitive control operations.
“The lateral prefrontal cortex has been particularly implicated in the support of cognitive control operations (Norman and Shallice, 1986;Miller and Cohen, 2001).”
From The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity (2005) · cites this paper as Norman and Shallice, 1986
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 93 · Cited by 4,455
- Authors
- Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Medical Research Council (GB)
- ORCID
- Norman, Donald A.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Self-Regulation
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1986
- Pages
- 1-18
- OpenAlex
- W1511223926
- Cited by
- 4,455
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 157 · 2016: 159 · 2015: 187 · 2014: 188 · 2013: 221 · 2012: 225
- FWCI
- 20.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- attention, action control, automatic processing, controlled processing, action sequences, internal actions, external action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
