The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers
Abstract
A class of tests and estimators for the parameters of the Cox proportional hazards model, the accelerated failure time model, and a model for the effect of treatment on the mean of a response variable of interest are proposed that use surrogate marker data to recover information lost due to independent censoring and to adjust for bias due to dependent censoring in randomized clinical trials. We construct an adaptive test that (i) is asymptotically distribution free under the null hypothesis of no treatment effect on survival, (ii) incorporates surrogate marker data, and (iii) is guaranteed to be locally more powerful than the ordinary log-rank test against proportional hazards alternatives when the baseline failure time distribution is Weibull. The proposed test is shown to outperform the log-rank test in a series of simulation experiments. We also prove the optimal estimator within our class is semiparametric efficient by first showing that our estimation problem is a special case of the general problem of parameter estimation in an arbitrary semiparametric model with data missing at random, and then deriving a representation for the efficient score in this more general problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Robins, J. M., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1991) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929108830654 · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Cited by
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology
Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. Á., & Brumback, B. (2000) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011 · Cited by 5,581
Self-citationUsing Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1.
Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2016) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv254 · Cited by 3,115
Self-citationHernán, M. A., Sauer, B. C., Hernández-Díaz, S., Platt, R., & Shrier, I. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.014 · Cited by 1,097
Robins, J. M., & Finkelstein, D. M. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00779.x · Cited by 877
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, J. M., & Rotnitzky, A.
- Venue
- AIDS Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser Boston
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 297-331
- OpenAlex
- W128574488
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4757-1229-2_14
- The paper
- Robins, J. M., & Rotnitzky, A. (1992). Recovery of Information and Adjustment for Dependent Censoring Using Surrogate Markers. AIDS Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1229-2_14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.