The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Reasoning in Medicine
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A two-sided α was chosen to cover potential inferiority of the miCBT. This corresponds to the conservative approach commonly used in the scientific community (48, 49).”
From Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for the Prophylaxis of Migraine in Adults: A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ISSUES RELATED TO SUBGROUP ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL TRIALS
Cui, L., Hung, H., Wang, S., & Tsong, Y. (2002) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1081/bip-120014565 · Cited by 77
What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Foley, P. W. X., Leyva, F., & Frenneaux, M. P. (2009) · EP Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eup308 · Cited by 72
“the sample size is adequate, that the effect size is clinically meaningful, or that the parameter in question has discriminatory ability.(23) Diagnostic utility should be tested using Bayesian analyses.”
BackgroundLOPSIDED REASONING ON LOPSIDED TESTS AND MULTIPLE COMPARISONS
Hurlbert, S. H., & Lombardi, C. M. (2012) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2012.00652.x · Cited by 68
The Charisma of Subgroups and the Subgroups of CHARISMA
Pfeffer, M. A., & Jarcho, J. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme068061 · Cited by 64
Gorman, D. M., Conde, E., & Huber, J. C. (2007) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230701613544 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyé, L. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moyé, Lemuel A.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2000
- OpenAlex
- W2494933741
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probabilistic Statistics in Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Keywords
- statistical reasoning, medical statistics, clinical decision-making, evidence-based medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Reasoning in Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4757-3292-4
- The paper
- Moyé, L. A. (2000). Statistical Reasoning in Medicine. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3292-4
