Cited by 249Personality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingEmotional Intelligence and Performance

International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence

Donald H. Saklofske, Moshe Zeidner·1995·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extraversion-intelligence findings are inconsistent with respect to the nature of the relationship.

    “A review of the extraversion-intelligence relation suggests that the findings are inconsistent with respect to the nature of the relationship (Saklofske & Zeidner, 1995).”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Saklofske & Zeidner, 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saklofske, D. H., & Zeidner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1995
OpenAlex
W4299553960
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.07
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
personality, intelligence, integrative theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review