CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 123Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFish biology, ecology, and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Telencephalon of Actinopterygian Fishes

Nieuwenhuys, R., Meek, J.·1990·Cerebral Cortex
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-9622-3_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-9622-3_2

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 113 references

2 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Daget, J., 1958, Sous-classe des brachiopterygiens, Trait. Zool. 13:2500–2521.
  2. Gage, S. P., 1893, The brain of Diemyctilus viridescens from larval to adult life and comparison with the brain of Amia and of Petromyzon, The Wilder Quarter Century Book, Ithaca, pp. 259-314.
  3. Herrick, C. J., 1922, Functional Factors in the Morphology of the Forebrain of Fishes, Libro en honor de D. Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Volume 1, pp. 143–204.
  4. Jarvik, E., 1968a, The Systematic Position of the Dipnoi, Nobel Symposium 4 (T. Orvig, ed.), Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, pp. 223–245.
  5. Källén, B., 1950b, Contributions to the ontogeny of the everted forebrain, K. Fysiogr. Saellsk. Lund Foerh. 20:87–110.
  6. Källén, B., 1951, Embryological studies on the nuclei and their homologization in the vertebrate forebrain, K. Fysiogr. Saellsk. Handl. 62(5):34.
  7. Kuhlenbeck, H., 1929, Die Grundbestandteile des Endhirns im Lichte der Bauplanlehre, Anat. Anz. 67:1–51.
  8. McCormick, C. A., 1978, Central projections of the lateralis and eight nerves in the bowfin, Amia calva, thesis, Ann Arbor, p. 131.
  9. Nieuwenhuys, R., 1959, The structure of the telencephalon of the teleost Gasterosteurs aculeatus I en II, K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam Proc. Sect. Sci. 62:341–362.
  10. Nieuwenhuys, R., and Verrijdt, P. W. Y, 1983, Structure and connections of the telencephalon of the teleost fish Xenomystis nigri. II. The area dorsalis, Acta Morphol. Neerl. Scand. 21:330.
  11. Weston, J. K., 1937, Notes on the telencephalon of Mormyrus and Gnathonemus, K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam Proc. Sect. Sci. 40:894–904.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–121 of 121

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nieuwenhuys, R., & Meek, J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
ORCID
Nieuwenhuys, R.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1990
Pages
31-73
ISSN
1566-6816 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4757-9622-3_2
OpenAlex
W30976412
Cited by
123
References
113
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cerebral cortex (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
Keywords
telencephalon, actinopterygian fishes, Actinopterygii, Chondrostei, Holostei, teleosts, vertebrate evolution, Sarcopterygii, lungfish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review