CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 503Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchRace, History, and American Society

Group Conflict, Prejudice, and the Paradox of Contemporary Racial Attitudes

Bobo, Lawrence·1988·Eliminating Racism
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 212 · Cited by 503

Authors
Bobo, L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Bobo, Lawrence
ORCID
Bobo, Lawrence
Venue
Eliminating Racism
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1988
Pages
85-114
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_5
OpenAlex
W1667345428
Cited by
503
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
35.57
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
racial attitudes, prejudice, group conflict, black-white relations, African Americans, racial inequality, social psychology of race

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review