The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods
Open accessAbstract
Introduction. Basic Concepts of Power System Reliability Evaluation. Elements of Monte Carlo Methods. Generating System Adequacy Assessment. Composite System Adequacy Assessment. Distribution System and Station Adequacy Assessment. Reliability Cost/Worth Assessment. Appendixes. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stochastic analyses of electric vehicle charging impacts on distribution network
Leou, R.-C., Su, C.-L., & Lu, C.-N. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2013.2291556 · Cited by 336
Power system reliability evaluation with SCADA cybersecurity considerations
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Xiang, Y., & Ten, C.-W. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2396994 · Cited by 239
Johansson, J., Hassel, H., & Zio, E. (2013) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.027 · Cited by 191
Fu, G., Wilkinson, S., Dawson, R. J., Fowler, H. J., Kilsby, C., Panteli, M., & Mancarella, P. (2018) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2017.2700791 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Billinton, R., & Li, W.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1994
- OpenAlex
- W1486460655
- Cited by
- 1,776
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4899-1346-3
- The paper
- Billinton, R., & Li, W. (1994). Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1346-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
