The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theoretical Statistics
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In this paper, for all the experiments, the confidence interval is lower than 0.5%, so any difference higher than this value, this difference can be considered as significant with a 95% a probability.”
From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results
Lander, E. S., & Kruglyak, L. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1195-241 · Cited by 5,236
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, D. R., & Hinkley, D. V.
- ORCID
- Cox, D. R.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1974
- OpenAlex
- W4240874411
- Cited by
- 3,089
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 153 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- mathematical statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
