Cited by 78Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySafety Systems Engineering in AutonomyAccess Control and Trust

Robust Intelligence and Trust in Autonomous Systems

Ranjeev Mittu, Donald Sofge, Alan Richard Wagner, William F. Lawless·2016·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mittu et al.'s study revealed that when an example supported the decision of a self-driving car abruptly changing lanes, passengers were more comfortable.

    “Mittu et al. [55].study revealed that when an example supported the decision of a self-driving car abruptly changing lanes, passengers were more comfortable.”
  • In a 2016 Tesla autopilot incident, the vehicle was unable to discern between the white side of the truck and a brightly lit sky, preventing the need to brake.

    “According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the vehicle was unable to discern between the white side of the truck and a brightly lit sky, preventing the need to brake that may have caused the passengers to suffer significant injuries [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittu, R., Sofge, D., Wagner, A. R., & Lawless, W. F.
Affiliations
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
  • Georgia Tech Research Institute (US)
  • Paine College (US)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2495843840
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.26
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
Keywords
trust, autonomous systems, human-automation interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review