CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archaeological Dimension of World Heritage: From Prevention to Social Implications

Castillo, A., Querol, M. A.·2014·SpringerBriefs in Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0283-5_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-0283-5_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Managing archaeological cultural assets requires considering a wide range of dimensions, from scientific to social aspects.

    “Managing archaeological cultural assets/resources/properties/goods, therefore, requires considering a wide range of dimensions, from scientific to social aspects (Castillo and Querol 2014).”

    From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as Castillo and Querol 2014

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Brattli, T. (2009). Managing the archaeological world cultural heritage: Consensus or rhetoric. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 42(1), 24–38. · DOI
  2. Castillo, A. (Ed.). (2012). Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Best Practices in World Heritage: Archaeology. Actas del I Congreso Internacional en Buenas Prácticas en Patrimonio Mundial: Arqueología. Editora Complutense (1076 pp.). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  3. Cleere, H. (Ed.). (1984). Approach to the Archaeological Heritage. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 132 pp.
  4. Cleere, H. (Ed.). (1989). Archaeological heritage management in the modern world. London: Unwin Hayman Ltd.. Republished in 2000 by Routledge.
  5. Coningham, R., Cooper, R., & Pollard, M. (2006). What value a unicorn’s horn? A study of archaeological uniqueness and value. In Scarre and Scarre (Ed.), The ethics of archaeology (pp. 260–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  6. Hood, M. G. (1983). Staying away: Why people choose not to visit museums. Museum News, April, 50–57.
  7. Labadi, S. (2001). Representations of the nation and cultural diversity in discourses on World Heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology, 7(2), 147–170. · DOI
  8. Martínez B, Castillo, A. (2007). Preventive archaeology in Spain. In Bozoki-Erneyey (Ed.) European preventive archaeology (pp. 187–208). Papers of the EPAC meeting 2004, Vinius.
  9. Morin, E. (2007). Introducción al pensamiento complejo (Spanishth ed.). Barcelona: Gedisa. 9th printing.
  10. Norwegian Archaeological Review. (2009). Comments on Terje Brattli: Managing the archaeological world cultural heritage: Consensus or rhetoric? Norwegian Archaeological Review, 42(1), 24–39. · DOI
  11. Querol, M. A., & Castillo, A. (2012). Arqueología Preventiva y Patrimonio Mundial. El ejemplo español como base para el cambio en el ejercicio de la gestión arqueológica. In Castillo A. (Ed.) Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Best Practices in World Heritage: Archaeology (pp. 51–65).
  12. Simpson, F., & Williams, H. (2008). Evaluating community archaeology in the UK. Public Archaeology, 7(2 Summer), 69–90. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Willems, W., & Van Den Dries, M. (Eds.). (2007). Quality management in archaeology. England: Oxbow Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Castillo, A., & Querol, M. A.
Venue
SpringerBriefs in Archaeology
Publisher
Springer New York
Published
2014
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1861-6623
  • 2192-4910
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4939-0283-5_1
Cited by
7
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review