Cited by 65Enzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Error-Prone PCR and Effective Generation of Gene Variant Libraries for Directed Evolution

Copp, Janine N., Hanson-Manful, Paulina, Ackerley, David F., Patrick, Wayne M.·2014·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Any single-enzyme directed evolution strategy has two fundamental requirements: the need to efficiently introduce variation into a gene of interest and the need to create an effective library from those variants. Generation of a maximally diverse gene library is particularly important when employing nontargeted mutagenesis strategies such as error-prone PCR (epPCR), which seek to explore very large areas of sequence space. Here we present comprehensive protocols and tips for using epPCR to generate gene variants that exhibit a relatively balanced spectrum of mutations and for capturing as much diversity as possible through effective cloning of those variants. The detailed library preparation methods that we describe are generally applicable to any directed evolution strategy that uses restriction enzymes to clone gene variants into an expression plasmid.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-1053-3_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Error-prone PCR tends to produce single-nucleotide substitutions, limiting its utility as it cannot produce the full repertoire of amino acid substitutions at each codon.

    “However, this tends to produce single-nucleotide substitutions, limiting its utility as this cannot produce the full repertoire of amino acid substitutions at each codon (45, 46).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Copp, J. N., Hanson-Manful, P., Ackerley, D. F., & Patrick, W. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Patrick, Wayne M.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published
2014
Volume
1179
Pages
3-22
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W1454215067
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
error-prone PCR, directed evolution, library diversity, expression plasmids, mutation spectrum
MeSH terms
Cloning, Molecular, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Directed Molecular Evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review