Cited by 5Redox biology and oxidative stressAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBiochemical Acid Research Studies

Redox-Regulated, Targeted Affinity Isolation of NADH-Dependent Protein Interactions with the Branched Chain Aminotransferase Proteins

Hindy, Maya E. L., Conway, Myra E.·2019·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Isolation and identification of protein targets for redox-active proteins is challenging. The human branched chain aminotransferase (hBCAT) proteins are redox active transaminases that can be regulated through oxidation, S-nitrosation and S-glutathionylation. This metabolic protein was shown to associate with the E1 decarboxylase component of the branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex in a NADH-dependent manner, where mutation of the CXXC center was shown to prevent complex formation. To determine if the redox state of the CXXC motif can influence other NADH-dependent protein-protein interactions, proteins were extracted from neuronal cells treated under reduced and oxidized conditions and then isolated using targeted affinity chromatography, resolved using 2D electrophoresis. Select proteins spots were excised and identified using a quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (Thermo) with a precursor tolerance of 10 ppm and subsequently analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 with Swiss-Prot human DB. Mass tolerances for precursor/product were set to 10 ppm/0.6 Da and data were filtered by peptide confidence with PD2.1. It was determined that the protein profile considerably altered in both number and abundance dependent on the redox state of the cell and also on the availability of the redox active thiol groups. The biological relevance of the newly identified partners was determined using DAVID, the bioinformatics database, which indicated that proteins important to cytoskeletal function, protein transport, protein synthesis, chaperone activity, and cell signaling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-9463-2_13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BCAT proteins have additional binding partners governed by their CXXC motif.

    “Targeted proteomic studies have indicated that the BCAT proteins have additional binding partners governed by their CXXC motif (Coles et al. 2009; Hindy and Conway 2019).”

    From Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting the glutamatergic system (2020) · cites this paper as Hindy and Conway 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 5

Authors
Hindy, M. E. L., & Conway, M. E.
Affiliations
University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Conway, Myra E.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2019
Volume
1990
Pages
151-163
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2947513562
Cited by
5
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.37
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Biochemical Acid Research Studies
Keywords
branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase, redox regulation, CXXC motif, S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation, branched-chain ketoacid dehydrogenase, redox state, sulfhydryl groups, neurons, protein-protein interaction network, cytoskeletal function, chaperone activity
MeSH terms
Transaminases, Chromatography, Affinity, Humans, NAD, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Oxidation-Reduction, Amino Acid Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review