Redox-Regulated, Targeted Affinity Isolation of NADH-Dependent Protein Interactions with the Branched Chain Aminotransferase Proteins
Abstract
Isolation and identification of protein targets for redox-active proteins is challenging. The human branched chain aminotransferase (hBCAT) proteins are redox active transaminases that can be regulated through oxidation, S-nitrosation and S-glutathionylation. This metabolic protein was shown to associate with the E1 decarboxylase component of the branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex in a NADH-dependent manner, where mutation of the CXXC center was shown to prevent complex formation. To determine if the redox state of the CXXC motif can influence other NADH-dependent protein-protein interactions, proteins were extracted from neuronal cells treated under reduced and oxidized conditions and then isolated using targeted affinity chromatography, resolved using 2D electrophoresis. Select proteins spots were excised and identified using a quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (Thermo) with a precursor tolerance of 10 ppm and subsequently analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.1 with Swiss-Prot human DB. Mass tolerances for precursor/product were set to 10 ppm/0.6 Da and data were filtered by peptide confidence with PD2.1. It was determined that the protein profile considerably altered in both number and abundance dependent on the redox state of the cell and also on the availability of the redox active thiol groups. The biological relevance of the newly identified partners was determined using DAVID, the bioinformatics database, which indicated that proteins important to cytoskeletal function, protein transport, protein synthesis, chaperone activity, and cell signaling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BCAT proteins have additional binding partners governed by their CXXC motif.
“Targeted proteomic studies have indicated that the BCAT proteins have additional binding partners governed by their CXXC motif (Coles et al. 2009; Hindy and Conway 2019).”
From Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting the glutamatergic system (2020) · cites this paper as Hindy and Conway 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Hindy, M. E. L., & Conway, M. E.
- Affiliations
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Conway, Myra E.
- ORCID
- Conway, Myra E.
- Venue
- Methods in Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 1990
- Pages
- 151-163
- ISSN
- 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6029
- OpenAlex
- W2947513562
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Biochemical Acid Research Studies
- Keywords
- branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase, redox regulation, CXXC motif, S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation, branched-chain ketoacid dehydrogenase, redox state, sulfhydryl groups, neurons, protein-protein interaction network, cytoskeletal function, chaperone activity
- MeSH terms
- Transaminases, Chromatography, Affinity, Humans, NAD, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Oxidation-Reduction, Amino Acid Motifs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review