Cited by 130

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Immobilization of Enzymes

Brena, Beatriz M., Batista-Viera, Francisco·2006·Methods in Biotechnology™

Abstract

The term “immobilized enzymes” refers to “enzymes physically confined or localized in a certain defined region of space with retention of their catalytic activities, and which can be used repeatedly and continuously”;. Besides the application in industrial processes, the immobilization techniques are the basis for making a number of biotechnological products with applications in diagnostics, bioaffinity chromatography, and biosensors. Initially, only immobilized single enzymes were used, but the 1970s saw the development of more complex systems—including two-enzyme reactions with co-factor regeneration and living cells. The major components of an immobilized enzyme system are the enzyme, the matrix, and the mode of attachment. The enzymes can be attached to the support by interactions ranging from reversible physical adsorption and ionic linkages to stable covalent bonds. The covalent reactions commonly employed give rise to binding through amide, ether, thio-ether, or carbamate bonds. As a consequence of enzyme immobilization, some properties such as catalytic activity or thermal stability become altered. These effects have been demonstrated and exploited. The concept of stabilization has been an important driving force for immobilizing enzymes. True stabilization at the molecular level has been demonstrated (e.g., proteins immobilized through multipoint covalent binding).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-59745-053-9_2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Stryer L. (1995) Biochemistry, Freeman, New York.
  2. Creighton T. E. (1984) Proteins, Freeman, Oxford, UK.
  3. Katchalski-Katzir E. (1993) Immobilized enzymes: Learning from past successes and failures. Trends Biotechnol. 11, 471–478 · DOI
  4. Tosa T., Mori T. Fuse N., and Chibata I. (1966) Studies on continuous enzyme reactions. I. Screening of carriers for preparation of water-insoluble aminoacylase. Enzymologia. 31, 214–224.
  5. Tanaka A., Tosa T., and Kobayashi T. (1993) Industrial Application of Immobilized Biocatalysts, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
  6. Swaisgood H. E. (1985) Immobilization of enzymes and some applications in the food industry. In: Enzymes and Immobilized Cells in Biotechnology (Laskin A. I., ed.), Benjamin Cummings, London, 1–24.
  7. Guibault G. G., Kauffmann J. M., and Patriarche G. J. (1991) Immobilized Enzyme Electrodes as Biosensors. In: Protein Immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NT, 209–262.
  8. Taylor R.F. (1991) Immobilized Antibody and Receptor Based Biosensors. In: Protein Immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 263–303.
  9. Chang M. S. (1991) Therapeutic Applications of Immobilized Proteins and Cells. In: Protein Immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 305–318.
  10. Bickerstaff G. F. (1995) Impact of genetic technology on enzyme technology. Genet. Engineer Biotechnologist 15, 13–30.
  11. Hartmeier W. (1988) Immobilized Biocatalysts, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. · DOI
  12. Trevan M. (1980) Techniques of Immobilization. In: Immobilized Enzymes. An Introduction and Applications in Biotechnology (Trevan M., ed.), Wiley, Chichester-New York, 1–9.
  13. Brodelius P. and Mosbach K. (1987) Immobilization Techniques for Cells/Organelles. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume 135, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, London, 173–454.
  14. Buchholz K. and Klein J. (1987) Characterization of Immobilized Biocatalysts. In: Methods in Enzymology volume 135, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, London, 3–30.
  15. Cabral J.M.S. and Kennedy J. F (1991) Covalent and coordination immobilization of proteins. In: Protein immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 73–138.
  16. Gemeiner P. (1992) Materials for enzyme engineering. In: Enzyme Engineering (Gemeiner P., ed.), Ellis Horwood, New York, NY, 13–119.
  17. Gupta M. and Mattiasson B. (1992) Unique applications of immobilized proteins in bioanalytical systems. In: Methods of Biochemical Analysis, volume 36, (Suelter C.H., ed.), Wiley, New York, NY, 1–34. · DOI
  18. Mattiasson B. and Kaul R. (1991) Determination of coupling yields and handling of labile proteins in immobilization technology. In: Protein immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 161–179.
  19. Scouten W. H. (1987) A Survey of Enzyme Coupling Techniques. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume 135, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, London, 30–65. · DOI
  20. White C. A. and Kennedy J. F. (1980) Popular matrices for enzyme and other immobilizations. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2, 82–90. · DOI
  21. Taylor R. F. (1991) Commercially available supports for protein immobilization. In: Protein immobilization. Fundamentals and Applications (Taylor R. F., ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 139–160.
  22. Lawson T. G., Regnier F. E., and Wieth H. L. (1983) Separation of synthetic oligo-nucleotides on columns of microparticulate silica coated with crosslinked polyethylene-imine. Anal. Biochem. 133, 85–93. · DOI
  23. Axén R., Porath J. and Ernback S. (1967) Chemical coupling of peptides and proteins to polysaccharides by means of cyanogen halides. Nature 214, 1302–1304. · DOI
  24. Porath J. and Axén R. (1976) Immobilization of enzymes to agar, agarose, and Sephadex supports. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XLIV, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 19–45. · DOI
  25. Guisán J. M. (1988) Agarose-aldehyde gels as supports for immobilization-stabilization of enzymes. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 10, 375–382. · DOI
  26. Wilchek M. and Miron T. (1982) A spectrophotometric assay for soluble and immobilized N-hydroxysuccinimide esters. Anal. Biochem. 126, 433–435. · DOI
  27. Drobníck J., Labský W., Kudlvasrová H., Saudek V., and Svec F. (1982) The activation of hydroxy groups of carriers with 4-nitrophenyl and N-hydroxysuccinimidyl chloroformates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24, 487–493. · DOI
  28. Parikh I., March S., and Cuatrecasas P. (1974) Topics in the methodology of substitution reactions with agarose. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XXXIV (Jacoby W.B. and Wilchek M. eds.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 77–102. · DOI
  29. Inman J. K. and Dintzis H. M. (1969) The derivatization of cross-linked polyacrylamide beads. Controlled introduction of functional groups for the preparation of special-purpose, biochemical adsorbents. Biochemistry 8, 4074–4082. · DOI
  30. Rozprimova L., Franek F. and Kubanek V. (1978) Utilization of powder polyester in making insoluble antigens and pure antibodies. Cesk. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Immunol. 27, 335–341.
  31. Ngo T. T., Laidler K. J., and Yam C. F. (1979) Kinetics of acetylcholinesterase immobilized on polyethylene tubing. Can. J. Biochemistry 57, 1200–1203. · DOI
  32. Grubhofer N. and Schleith L. (1954). Protein coupling with diazotized polyaminostyrene. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol. Chem. 297, 108–112. · DOI
  33. Beitz J., Schellemberger A., Lasch J., and Fischer J. (1980) Catalytic properties and electrostatic potential of charged immobilized enzyme derivatives. Pyruvate decarboxylase attached to cationic polystyrene beads of different charge densities. Biochim. Biophys Acta 612, 451–454. · DOI
  34. Hornby W. E. and Goldstein L. (1976) Immobilization of enzymes on nylon. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XXXIV, (Jacoby W.B. and Wilchek M., eds.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 118–134.
  35. O’Driscoll K. F. (1976) Techniques of enzyme entrapment in gels. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XLIV, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 169–183. · DOI
  36. Bernfeld P. and Wan J. (1963) Antigens and enzymes made insoluble by entrapping them into lattices of synthetic polymers. Science 142, 678–679. · DOI
  37. Dinelli D., Marconi W., and Morisi F. (1976) Fiber-entrapped enzymes. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XLIV, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 227–243.
  38. Wadiack D. T. and Carbonell R. G. (1975) Kinetic behavior of microencapsulated β-galactosidase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17, 1157–1181. · DOI
  39. Messing R. A. (1976) Adsorption and inorganic bridge formations. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume XLIV, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 148–169.
  40. Woodward J. (1985) Immobilized enzymes: adsorption and covalent coupling. In: Immobilized Cells and Enzymes: A Practical Approach, (Woodward J., ed.), IRL, Oxford, UK, 3–17.
  41. Tosa T., Mori T., Fuse N., and Chibata I. (1967) Studies on continuous enzyme reactions I. Screening of carriers for preparation of water insoluble aminoacylase. Enzymologia 31, 214–224.
  42. Sharp A.K., Kay G., and Lilly M. D. (1969) The kinetics of β-galactosidase attached to porous cellulose sheets. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 11, 363–380. · DOI
  43. Bahulekar R., Ayangar N. R., and Ponrathnam S. (1991) Polyethyleneimine in immobilization of biocatalysts. Enzyme. Microb. Technol, 13, 858–868. · DOI
  44. Goldstein L. (1972) Microenvironmental effects on enzyme catalysis. A kinetic study of polyanionic and polycationic derivatives of chymotrypsin. Biochemistry 11, 4072–4084. · DOI
  45. Goldman R., Kedem O., Silman I., Caplan S., and Katchalski-Katzir E. (1968) Papain-collodion membranes. I. Preparation and properties. Biochemistry 7, 486–500. · DOI
  46. Guisan J.M., Alvaro G., Rosell C.M., and Fernandez-Lafuente R. (1994) Industrial design of enzymic processes catalysed by very active immobilized de-rivatives: utilization of diffusional limitations (gradients of pH) as a profitable tool in enzyme engineering. Biotechnol.Appl. Biochem. 20, 357–369. · DOI
  47. Porath J. (1987) Salting-out adsorption techniques for protein purification Biopolymers 26, S193–204. · DOI
  48. Caldwell K., Axen R., Bergwall M., and Porath J.(1976) Immobilization of enzymes based on hydrophobic interaction. I. Preparation and properties of a betaamylase adsorbate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 18, 1573–1588. · DOI
  49. Caldwell K., Axén R., Bergwall M., and Porath J.(1976) Immobilization of enzymes based on hydrophobic interaction. II. Preparation and properties of an amyloglucosidase adsorbate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 18, 1589–1604. · DOI
  50. Cashion P., Lentini V., Harrison D., and Javed, A. (1982) Enzyme immobilization on trityl-agarose: Reusability of both matrix and enzyme. Bioechnol. Bioeng. 24, 1221–1224. · DOI
  51. Yon R. (1974) Enzyme purification by hydrophobic chromatography: an alternative approach illustrated in the purification of aspartate transcarbamoylase from wheat germ. Biochem. J. 137, 127–130. · DOI
  52. Dixon J., Andrews P., and Butler L. (1979) Hydrophobic esters of cellulose: properties and applications in biochemical technology. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 21, 2113–2123. · DOI
  53. Solomon B., Hollaander Z., Koppel R., and Katchalski-Kazir E. (1987) Use of monoclonal antibodies for the preparation of highly active immobilized enzymes. In: Methods in Enzymology, volume 135, (Mosbach K., ed.), Academic Press, London, 160–170.
  54. Cabral J. M. S., Novais J. M., and Kennedy J. F. (1986) Immobilization studies of whole microbial cells on transition metal activated inorganic supports. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23, 157–162. · DOI
  55. Kennedy J.F. and Cabral J.M.S. (1985) Immobilization of biocatalysts by metallink/ chelation processes. In: Immobilized Cells and Enzymes, (Woodward J., ed.), IRL, Oxford, UK, 19–37.
  56. Porath J. (1992) Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Protein Expr. Purif. 3, 263–281. · DOI
  57. Kagedal L. (1998) Immobilized Metal Ion Affinity Chromatography. In: Protein Purification (Janson J. C. and Rydén L., eds.), Wiley-VCH, New York, NY, 311–342.
  58. Brena B., Ryden L., and Porath J. (1994). Immobilization of β-galactosidase on metal-chelated-substituted gels. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 19, 217–231. · DOI
  59. Carlsson J., Batista-Viera F., and Rydén L. (1998) Covalent Chromatography. In: Protein purification: principles, high-resolution methods, and applications, (Janson J. C. and Rydén L., eds.), Wiley-VCH, New York, NY, 343–373.
  60. Trevan M. (1980) Effect of Immobilization on Enzyme Activity. In: Immobilized Enzymes. An Introduction and Applications in Biotechnology (Trevan M. ed.), Wiley, Chichester-New York, 11–56.
  61. Blanco R. M., Calvete J. J., and Guisan J. M. (1989) Immobilization-stabilization of enzymes. Variables that control the intensity of the trypsin (amine)-agarose-( aldehyde)-multipoint attachment. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 11, 353–359. · DOI
  62. Koch-Schmidt A. and Mosbach K. (1977) Studies on conformation of soluble and immobilized enzymes using differential scanning calorimetry. 1. Thermal sta-bility of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dependent dehydrogenases. Biochemistry 16, 2101–2105. · DOI
  63. Koch-Schmidt A. and Mosbach K. (1977). Studies on conformation of soluble and immobilized enzymes using differential scanning calorimetry. 2. Specific activity and thermal stability of enzymes bound weakly and strongly to Sepharose CL 4B. Biochemistry 16, 2105–2109. · DOI
  64. Gabel D., Steinberg I., and Katchalski-Kazir E. (1971) Changes in conformation of insolubilized trypsin and chymotrypsin, followed by fluorescence. Biochemistry 10, 4661–4669. · DOI
  65. Boundy J., Smiley K.L., Swanson C.L., and Hofreiter B.T. (1976) Exoenzymic activity of alpha-amylase immobilized on a phenol-formaldehyde resin Carbohydr. Res. 48, 239–244. · DOI
  66. Guisán J. M., Penzol G., Armisen P., et al. (1997) Immobilization of enzymes acting on macromolecular substrates. In: Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells, (Bickerstaff G. F., ed.), Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 261–275.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brena, B. M., & Batista-Viera, F.
Venue
Methods in Biotechnology™
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2006
Pages
15-30
ISSN
  • 1940-6061
  • 1940-607X
Cited by
130
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review