The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot
Open accessAbstract
The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), and the Protein Information Resource (PIR) form the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) consortium. Its main goal is to provide the scientific community with a central resource for protein sequences and functional information. The UniProt consortium maintains the UniProt KnowledgeBase (UniProtKB) and several supplementary databases including the UniProt Reference Clusters (UniRef) and the UniProt Archive (UniParc). (1) UniProtKB is a comprehensive protein sequence knowledgebase that consists of two sections: UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, which contains manually annotated entries, and UniProtKB/TrEMBL, which contains computer-annotated entries. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries contain information curated by biologists and provide users with cross-links to about 100 external databases and with access to additional information or tools. (2) The UniRef databases (UniRef100, UniRef90, and UniRef50) define clusters of protein sequences that share 100, 90, or 50% identity. (3) The UniParc database stores and maps all publicly available protein sequence data, including obsolete data excluded from UniProtKB. The UniProt databases can be accessed online (http://www.uniprot.org/) or downloaded in several formats (ftp://ftp.uniprot.org/pub). New releases are published every 2 weeks. The purpose of this chapter is to present a guided tour of a UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entry, paying particular attention to the specificities of plant protein annotation. We will also present some of the tools and databases that are linked to each entry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Cited by
The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature
Drula, E., Garron, M.-L., Dogan, S., Lombard, V., Henrissat, B., & Terrapon, N. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1045 · Cited by 2,439
Guex, N., Peitsch, M. C., & Schwede, T. (2009) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200900140 · Cited by 2,097
The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
Stenson, P. D., Mort, M., Ball, E. V., Howells, K., Phillips, A. D., Thomas, N. S., & Cooper, D. N. (2009) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm13 · Cited by 873
Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface
Imachi, H., Nobu, M. K., Nakahara, N., Morono, Y., Ogawara, M., Takaki, Y., Takano, Y., Uematsu, K., Ikuta, T., Ito, M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1916-6 · Cited by 624
The GOA database in 2009--an integrated Gene Ontology Annotation resource
Barrell, D., Dimmer, E., Huntley, R. P., Binns, D., O'Donovan, C., & Apweiler, R. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn803 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Boutet, E., Lieberherr, D., Tognolli, M., Schneider, M., & Bairoch, A.
- Venue
- Plant Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Humana Press
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 406
- Pages
- 89-112
- OpenAlex
- W24553703
- Cited by
- 763
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.97
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-59745-535-0_4
- The paper
- Boutet, E., Lieberherr, D., Tognolli, M., Schneider, M., & Bairoch, A. (2007). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. Plant Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-535-0_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
