Cited by 103Genetic diversity and population structureMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

SNP genotyping by the 5’-nuclease reaction: Advances in high-throughput genotyping with nonmodel organisms

Seeb, James E., Pascal, Carita E., Ramakrishnan, Ramesh, Seeb, Lisa W.·2009·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Population genetics studies play an increasingly important role in the management and conservation of nonmodel organisms. Unlike studies with model organisms, a typical population genetics study of a nonmodel organism may be conducted by analyzing thousands or hundreds of thousands of individuals for several dozen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The use of robust, robotically mediated TaqMan reactions provides substantial advantages in these types of studies. We describe the methods and laboratory setup for analyzing a sustained high throughput of SNP assays in routine university or natural resource agency laboratories with a handful of thermal cyclers. Agencies sustain rates of nearly 150,000 assays per week using uniplex reactions with the Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (AB 7900HT). We further describe the medium-density array run on the BioMark from Fluidigm, which increases this rate to over 500,000 assays per week by multiplexing 96 samples for 96 SNPs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-60327-411-1_18

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commercial SNP kits like Fluidigm's 96.96 Dynamic Array interrogate a few hundred ancestry-informative markers, providing information comparable to a 24-locus STR while reducing cost per data point.

    “Commercial kits like Fluidigm’s 96.96 Dynamic Array interrogate a few hundred ancestry-informative markers, providing a level of information comparable to a 24-locus STR while reducing the cost per data point [50].”
  • SNP panels offer the added benefit of detecting copy-number variations larger than 50 kb.

    “However, they also offer the added benefit of detecting copy-number variations (CNVs) larger than 50 kb.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Seeb, J. E., Pascal, C. E., Ramakrishnan, R., & Seeb, L. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Standard BioTools (United States) (US)
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2009
Volume
578
Pages
277-292
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W179337858
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.78
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
SNP genotyping, 5' nuclease assay, TaqMan probes, high-throughput genotyping, non-model organisms, population genetics, conservation genetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Deoxyribonucleases, Genotype, Humans, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Models, Animal, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review