Cited by 18Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtist diversity and phylogenyMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

The Tree of Life Viewed Through the Contents of Genomes

House, Christopher H.·2009·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

A universal Tree of Life has been a longstanding goal of the biosciences. The most common Tree of Life, based on the small subunit rRNA gene, may or may not represent the phylogenetic history of microorganisms. The horizontal transfer of genes from one taxon to another provides a means by which each gene may tell of an independent history. When complete genomes became available, the extent to which horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has occurred became more evident. When using genomic data to study the Tree of Life, one can use any of the four broad approaches: (i) build lots of individual gene trees ("phylogenomics"), (ii) concatenate genes together for an analysis yielding one "supergene" tree, (iii) form a single tree based on the "gene content" within genomes using either orthologs or homologs, or (iv) investigate the order of genes within genomes to discern some aspects of microbial evolution. The application of whole genome tree building has suggested that there is a core tree, that such a core tree can be investigated using these varied methods, and that the results are largely similar to those of the rRNA universal Tree of Life. Some of the most interesting features of the rRNA tree, such as early diverging hyperthermophilic lineages are still uncertain, but remain a possibility. Genomic trees and geologic evidence together suggest that the vertical descent of genes and the horizontal transfer of genes between genetically similar lineages ultimately results in a core Tree of Life with at least some lineages that have phenotypic characteristics recognizable for billions of years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_8

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In spite of frequent HGT, a central trend of predominantly vertical evolution is discernible and leaves the notion of a tree of life.

    “However, using a variety of phylogenetic and phylogenomic approaches, it became subsequently clear that, in spite of frequent HGT, a central trend of predominantly vertical evolution is discernible and leaves the notion of a tree of life (e.g.House 2009, Puigbò et al. 2009, 2010).”

    From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as House 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
House, C. H.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
House, Christopher H.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2009
Volume
532
Pages
141-161
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W123359234
Cited by
18
References
8
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NASA Astrobiology Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
universal tree of life, phylogenomics, horizontal gene transfer, small subunit rRNA phylogeny, gene order, core genome, microbial evolution
MeSH terms
Genetics, Microbial, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review