Cited by 198RNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Rare DiseasesBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Use of Splicing Reporter Minigene Assay to Evaluate the Effect on Splicing of Unclassified Genetic Variants

Gaildrat, Pascaline, Killian, Audrey, Martins, Alexandra, Tournier, Isabelle, Frébourg, Thierry, Tosi, Mario·2010·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

The interpretation of the numerous sequence variants of unknown biological and clinical significance (UV for "unclassified variant") found in genetic screenings represents a major challenge in the molecular diagnosis of genetic disease, including cancer susceptibility. A fraction of UVs may be deleterious because they affect mRNA splicing. Here, we describe a functional splicing assay based on a minigene construct that assesses the impact of sequence variants on splicing. A genomic segment encompassing the variant sequence of interest along with flanking intronic sequences is PCR-amplified from patient genomic DNA and is cloned into a minigene vector. After transient transfection into cultured cells, the splicing patterns of the transcripts generated from the wild-type and from the variant constructs are compared by reverse transcription-PCR analysis and sequencing. This method represents a complementary approach to reverse transcription-PCR analyses of patient RNA, for the identification of pathogenic splicing mutations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-60761-759-4_15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Candidate splice-altering variants were validated using a minigene splicing assay.

    “Candidate splice‐altering variants were validated using a minigene splicing assay (Appendix S1).8”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaildrat, P., Killian, A., Martins, A., Tournier, I., Frébourg, T., & Tosi, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2010
Volume
653
Pages
249-257
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2275450346
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
variants of uncertain significance, mRNA splicing, splicing mutation, pathogenic variant identification, cancer susceptibility, molecular diagnosis, intronic variants
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Neoplasms, RNA, Messenger, Transfection, Genetic Variation, Alternative Splicing, Genes, Reporter, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review