Cited by 9thermodynamics and calorimetric analysesBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProtein Structure and Dynamics

Allosteric Coupling Between Transition Metal-Binding Sites in Homooligomeric Metal Sensor Proteins

Grossoehme, Nicholas E., Giedroc, David P.·2012·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Intracellular concentrations of transition metal ions are controlled at the transcriptional level by a panel of metalloregulatory proteins that collectively allow the cell to respond to changes in bioavailable metal concentration to elicit the appropriate cellular response, e.g., upregulation of genes coding for metal export or detoxification proteins in the event of metal excess. These proteins represent a specialized class of allosteric regulators that are ideal for studying ligand-mediated allostery in a comprehensive way due to the size, stability, reactivity, and the spectroscopic properties of transition metal ions as allosteric ligands. In addition to the commonly studied heterotropic regulation of metal binding and DNA binding, many of these proteins exhibit homotropic allostery, i.e., communication between two or more identical metal (ligand) binding sites on an oligomer. This chapter aims to guide the reader through the design and execution of experiments that allow quantification of the thermodynamic driving forces (ΔG (C), ΔH (C), and ΔS (C)) that govern both homotropic and heterotropic allosteric interactions in metal sensor proteins as well as the steps required to remove the influence of complex speciation from the measured parameter values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-61779-334-9_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metal binding to metalloregulators often affects DNA affinity, and the converse is also true; these effects need to be considered when assessing sensitivity.

    “Further, since metal binding to metalloregulators often affects DNA affinity, the converse is also true,26 and these effects need to be considered when assessing sensitivity.3,4”
  • Sensitivity is determined by the affinity of the metalloregulator for its cognate ion and the effects of DNA-binding on metal affinity.

    “Sensitivity is determined by the affinity of the metalloregulator for its cognate ion and the effects of DNA-binding on metal affinity (thermodynamic coupling), as discussed in detail elsewhere.26,30”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossoehme, N. E., & Giedroc, D. P.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Grossoehme, Nicholas E.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published
2011-09-18
Volume
796
Pages
31-51
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2418590792
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
metalloregulatory proteins, transition metal ions, metal binding sites, allosteric regulation, metal speciation
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Binding Sites, Calorimetry, Metals, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review