Cited by 13Environmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesResearch Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data Management

Laboratory information management systems for DNA barcoding

Parker, Meaghan, Stones-Havas, Steven, Starger, Craig, Meyer, Christopher·2012·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

In the field of molecular biology, laboratory information management systems (LIMSs) have been created to track workflows through a process pipeline. For the purposes of DNA barcoding, this workflow involves tracking tissues through extraction, PCR, cycle sequencing, and consensus assembly. Importantly, a LIMS that serves the DNA barcoding community must link required elements for public submissions (e.g., primers, trace files) that are generated in the molecular lab with specimen metadata. Here, we demonstrate an example workflow of a specimen's entry into the LIMS database to the publishing of the specimen's genetic data to a public database using Geneious bioinformatics software. Throughout the process, the connections between steps in the workflow are maintained to facilitate post-processing annotation, structured reporting, and fully transparent edits to reduce subjectivity and increase repeatability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Parker, M., Stones-Havas, S., Starger, C., & Meyer, C.
Affiliations
Smithsonian Institution (US)
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2012
Volume
858
Pages
269-310
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2473714925
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
laboratory information management system, DNA barcoding, specimen metadata, workflow tracking, DNA extraction, PCR, cycle sequencing, structured reporting, data annotation, repeatability
MeSH terms
Clinical Laboratory Information Systems, Software, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Computational Biology, DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review