Cited by 5EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyTactile and Sensory Interactions

Preliminary Results Using a P300 Brain-Computer Interface Speller: A Possible Interaction Effect Between Presentation Paradigm and Set of Stimuli

Open access
Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro, Medina-Juliá, María Teresa, Velasco-Álvarez, Francisco, Ron-Angevin, Ricardo·2019·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-20521-8_31

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 5

Authors
Fernández-Rodríguez, Á., Medina-Juliá, M. T., Velasco-Álvarez, F., & Ron-Angevin, R.
Affiliations
Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Corresponding author
Fernández-Rodríguez, Álvaro
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2019
Pages
371-381
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2948154109
Cited by
5
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
P300, rapid serial visual presentation, stimulus set, picture stimuli, information transfer rate, calibration, visual evoked potentials, interaction effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review