Open Source Software Community Inclusion Initiatives to Support Women Participation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All CoCs studied by Tourani et al. championed diversity and a welcoming community and encouraged respectful and constructive collaboration.
“All CoCs studied by Tourani et al. championed diversity and a welcoming community and encouraged respectful and constructive collaboration [22,24].”
From Codes of Conduct in Open Source (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Gender differences and bias in open source: pull request acceptance of women versus men
Terrell, J., Kofink, A., Middleton, J., Rainear, C., Murphy-Hill, E., Parnin, C., & Stallings, J. (2017) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.111 · Cited by 287 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Anecdotal evidence about the negative experiences of women in the OSS communities has been in the spotlight via media and on the internet [6, 8 and 17] and highly controversial empirical research [18] that show that the contributions of women receive inferior treatment than the contributions of men.”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Codes of Conduct in Open Source
Frluckaj, H., & Howison, J. (2024) · Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_17 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Singh, V., & Brandon, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Vandana
- ORCID
- Singh, Vandana
- Venue
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- AICT-556
- Pages
- 68-79
- ISSN
- 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1868-4238
- OpenAlex
- W2944940285
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- open source communities, gender inclusion, women-only spaces, codes of conduct, online communities, mentoring networks, women in IT
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
