Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Lean Production to Industrie 4.0: More Autonomy for Employees?

Butollo, Florian, Jürgens, Ulrich, Krzywdzinski, Martin·2019·Digitalization in Industry
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Adler, P. S. (2007). The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1313–1345. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baumann, H. (2013). Order Picking Supported by Mobile Computing. Dissertation. Bremen.
  3. Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. (2018). The Link Between Industrie 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing: Mapping Current Research and Establishing a Research Agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 1–17.
  4. Dohse, K., Jürgens, U., & Malsch, T. (1984). Vom „Fordismus“ zum „Toyotismus“? Die Organisation der industriellen Arbeit in der japanischen Automobilindustrie. Leviathan, 12(4), 448–477.
  5. Dombrowski, U., Richter, T., & Krenkel, P. (2017). Interdependencies of Industrie 4.0 & Lean Production Systems: A Use Cases Analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1061–1068. · DOI
  6. Fucini, J., & Fucini, S. (1990). Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda’s American Auto Plant. New York: Free Press.
  7. Fujimoto, T. (1999). The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Graham, L. (1995). Subaru-Isuzu: Worker Response in a Nonunion Japanese Transplant. In B. Steve (Pub.), Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry (pp. 199–206). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  9. Holweg, M. (2007). The Genealogy of Lean Production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 420–437. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ihara, R. (2007). Toyota’s Assembly Line: A View from the Factory Floor. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
  11. Jürgens, U. (2017). Lean Production/Toyotismus. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen & H. Minssen (Eds.), Lexikon der Arbeits- und Industriesoziologie (pp. 204–207). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  12. Jürgens, U., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2016). New Worlds of Work: Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  13. Kagermann, H. (2014). Chancen von Industrie 4.0 nutzen. In T. Bauernhansl, M. Hompel, & B. Vogel-Heuser (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (pp. 603–614). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  14. Krafcik, J. (1988). Triumph of the Lean Production System. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41–52.
  15. Kuhlmann, M., Splett, B., & Wiegrefe, S. (2018). Montagearbeit 4.0? Eine Fallstudie zu Arbeitswirkungen und Gestaltungsperspektiven digitaler Werkerführung. WSI-Mitteilungen, 71(3), 182–188. · DOI
  16. Liker, J. K., & Hoseus, M. (2008). Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  17. Mättig, B., Jost, J., & Kirks, T. (2018). Erweiterte Horizonte – Ein technischer Blick in die Zukunft der Arbeit. In S. Wischmann & E. A. Hartmann (Eds.), Zukunft der Arbeit – Eine praxisnahe Betrachtung (pp. 63–72). Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
  18. Meier, K. J. (2017). Lean QRM 4.0 – Das Beste aus Lean Production, QRM und Industrie 4.0 vereint in einem gemeinsamen Managementansatz. In R. Koether & K. J. Meier (Eds.), Lean Production für die variantenreiche Einzelfertigung (pp. 119–135). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
  19. Meyer, A., Zander, S., Knapper, R., & Setzer, T. (2018). Decision Support Pipelines – Durchgängige Datenverarbeitungsinfrastrukturen für die Entscheidungen von morgen. In S. Wischmann & E. A. Hartmann (Eds.), Zukunft der Arbeit – Eine praxisnahe Betrachtung (pp. 207–209). Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
  20. Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The Quantified Self: What Counts in the Neoliberal Workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 774–792. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mormann, H. (2016). Das Projekt SAP: Zur Organisationssoziologie betriebswirtschaftlicher Standardsoftware. Bielefeld: Transcript. · DOI
  22. Nachtwey, O., & Staab, P. (2016). Die Avantgarde des digitalen Kapitalismus. Mittelweg 36, 24(6), 59–84.
  23. Nyhuis, P., Hübner, M., Quirico, M., Schäfers, P., & Schmidt, M. (2017). Veränderung in der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 31–50). Munich: Carl Hanser.
  24. Pfeiffer, S. (2003). SAP R/3 & Co. Integrierte Betriebswirtschaftliche Systeme als stille Helferlein des Lego-Kapitalismus. FIfF-Kommunikation, Mitteilungsblatt des Forum InformatikerInnen für Frieden und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung (FIfF) e.V., 20(3), 9–13.
  25. Reinhart, G., Bengler, K., Dollinger, C., Intra, C., Lock, C., Popova-Dlogosch, S., … Vernim, S. (2017). Der Mensch in der Produktion von Morgen. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 51–88). Munich: Carl Hanser.
  26. Rüttimann, B. G., & Stöckli, M. T. (2016). Lean and Industry 4.0—Twins, Partners, or Contenders? A Due Clarification Regarding the Supposed Clash of Two Production Systems. Journal of Service Science and Management, 9, 485–500.
  27. Schlick, J., Stephan, P., Loskyll, M., & Lappe, D. (2014). Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung. In T. Bauernhansl, M. Hompel, & B. Vogel-Heuser (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (pp. 57–84). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  28. Shimokawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2009). The Birth of Lean: Conversations with Taiichi Ohno, Eiji Toyoda, and Other Figures Who Shaped Toyota Management. Cambridge: Lean Enterprise Institute.
  29. Springer, R. (1999). Rückkehr zum Taylorismus? Arbeitspolitik in der Automobilindustrie am Scheideweg. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
  30. Steegmüller, D., & Zürn, M. (2017). Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme für den Automobilbau der Zukunft. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 27–44). Munich: Carl Hanser.
  31. Stewart, P., Richardson, M., Danford, A., Murphy, K., Richardson, T., & Wass, V. (2009). We Sell Our Time No More: Workers’ Struggles Against Lean Production in the British Car Industry. London: Pluto Press.
  32. Sugimori, Y., Kusunoki, K., Cho, F., & Uchikawa, P. (1977). Toyota Production System and Kanban System, Materialisation of Just-in-Time and Respect-for-Human System. International Journal of Production Research, 15, 553–564. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Weyer, J. (1997). Die Risiken der Automationsarbeit. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 26(4), 239–257. · DOI
  34. Weyer, J. (2007). Autonomie und Kontrolle. Arbeit in hybriden Systemen am Beispiel der Luftfahrt. Technikfolgenabschätzung − Theorie und Praxis, 16(2), 35–42. · DOI
  35. Williams, K., Haslam, C., & Williams, J. (1992). Ford Versus ‘Fordism’: The Beginning of Mass Production. Work, Employment & Society, 6(4), 517–555. · DOI
  36. Wireman, T. (1991). Total Productive Maintenance—An American Approach. New York: Industrial Press.

Cited by

See all 48

Metadata

Authors
Butollo, F., Jürgens, U., & Krzywdzinski, M.
Venue
Digitalization in Industry
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2019
Pages
61-80
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3
Cited by
48
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.