Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Cultural and political discourse analysisSocial Issues and PoliciesContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Language of Social Inequality

Augoustinos, Martha, Callaghan, Peta·2019·The Social Psychology of Inequality
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_20
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_20

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Augoustinos, M., & Callaghan, P.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Augoustinos, Martha
ORCID
Venue
The Social Psychology of Inequality
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2019
Pages
321-334
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_20
OpenAlex
W2984876014
Cited by
15
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Issues and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
racial inequality, gender inequality, income inequality, liberal egalitarianism, neoliberalism, dominant groups, justification of inequality, equity and fairness, individualism, social change, social policy, discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.