The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marxist Archaeologies Development: Peruvian, Latin American, and Social Archaeology Perspectives
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Hodder, I., & Hutson, S. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814211 · Cited by 929
Handbook of archaeological theories
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5070 · Cited by 286
Chapman, R. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203451779 · Cited by 271
The Use and Abuse of World Systems Theory: The Case of the Pristine West Asian State
Kohl, P. L. (1987) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-003111-5.50004-x · Cited by 127
Factional competition and political development in the New World: an introduction
Brumfiel, E. M. (1994) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598401.002 · Cited by 120
Kinship to kingship: gender hierarchy and state formation in the Tongan Islands
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0390 · Cited by 111
Bloch, M. E. F. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315017952 · Cited by 108
Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades
Hodder, I. (1991) · Cited by 104
Gailey, C. W. (1987) · University of Texas Press eBooks · doi:10.7560/724563 · Cited by 94
Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
(1987) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07007-7 · Cited by 93
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bate, L.F. 1998. El proceso de investigación en arqueología. Barcelona: Crítica.
- Lull, V. 2007. Los objetos distinguidos. La arqueología como excusa. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
- Lull, V., and R. Micó. 2007. Arqueología del origen del estado. Las teorías. Barcelona: Bellaterra.
- McGuire, R. 1992. A Marxist archaeology. San Diego: Academic.
- Navarrette, R. 2006. La arqueología social latinoamericana: Una meta, múltiples perspectivas. Caracas: Coordinación de Extensión de la FaCES, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
- Spriggs, M., ed. 1984. Marxist perspectives in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tantaleán, H., and M. Aguilar, eds. 2012. La Arqueología social latinoamericana. De la teoría a la praxis. Bogotá: CESO. Universidad de los Andes.
- Vargas, I., and M. Sanoja. 1999. Archaeology as a social science: Its expression in Latin America. In Archaeology in Latin America, ed. G. Politis and B. Alberti, 57–73. London: Routledge.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Tantaleán, H.
- Affiliations
- National University of San Marcos (PE)
- Corresponding author
- Tantaleán, Henry
- ORCID
- Tantaleán, Henry
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 6803-6810
- OpenAlex
- W4237588844
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 23
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Central America
- Keywords
- Marxist archaeology, social archaeology, Peruvian archaeology, Latin American archaeology, history of archaeological thought, archaeological theory, sociomateriality, societal transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review