CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 250Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsComputational and Text Analysis MethodsQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

The Trustworthiness of Content Analysis

Kyngäs, Helvi, Kääriäinen, Maria, Elo, Satu·2020·The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The researcher was careful not to impose preconceived interpretations on participants' experiences, and data were reported and interpreted within the principles of credulity, transferability, confirmability, and dependability to ensure research trustworthiness.

    “However, the researcher was careful not to impose preconceived interpretations on participants' experiences, and the data were reported and interpreted within the principle of credulity, transferability, confirmability and dependability to ensure research trustworthiness (Kyngäs et al., 2020).”

    From Challenges of Pre-service Teachers in Rural Places of Teaching Practice: A Decolonial Perspectives (2022) · cites this paper as Kyngäs et al., 2020

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Connelly LM. Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nurs. 2016;25:435–6.
  2. Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36:253–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000253 . · DOI
  3. Altheide DL, Johnson JM. Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In: Denizin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1994. p. 485–99.
  4. Eisenhart M, Howe K. Validity in educational research. In: LeCompte M, Millroy W, Preissle J, editors. Handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. p. 642–80.
  5. Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL. Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:522–37. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods. 2002;1:13–22. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications; 1985. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Robson C. Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.
  9. Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis. a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633 . · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., & Elo, S.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
ORCID
Venue
The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2019-11-01
Pages
41-48
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5
OpenAlex
W2985169008
Cited by
250
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 10
FWCI
97.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
trustworthiness, content analysis, credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, authenticity, qualitative research evaluation, researcher bias, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review