Cited by 8EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyEmotion and Mood Recognition

Linear SVM algorithm optimization for an EEG-based brain-computer interface used by high functioning autism spectrum disorder participants

Open access
Bittencourt-Villalpando, Mayra, Maurits, Natasha M.·2020·IFMBE Proceedings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_228

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bittencourt-Villalpando, M., & Maurits, N. M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bittencourt-Villalpando, Mayra
Venue
IFMBE Proceedings
Published
2019-09-25
Pages
1875-1884
ISSN
  • 1433-9277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-0737
OpenAlex
W2975206125
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, autism spectrum disorder, P300, linear support vector machine, EEG classification, parameter optimization, calibration data, attention training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review