Cited by 7EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification of P300 Component Using a Riemannian Ensemble Approach

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_229

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Amaral, C.P., Simões, M.A., Mouga, S., Andrade, J., Castelo-Branco, M.: A novel brain computer interface for classification of social joint attention in autism and comparison of 3 experimental setups: a feasibility study. J. Neurosci. Methods 290, 105–115 (2017) · DOI
  2. Barachant, A., Congedo, M.: A Plug & Play P300 BCI Using Information Geometry. arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.0107.pdf (2014) · arXiv
  3. Blankertz, B., Lemm, S., Treder, M., Haufe, S., Müller, K.R.: Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components - a tutorial. NeuroImage 56(2), 814–825 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
  4. Congedo, M., Barachant, A., Bhatia, R.: Riemannian geometry for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces; a primer and a review. Brain-Comput. Interfaces 4(3), 1–20 (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Farwell, L., Donchin, E.: Talking off the top of your head. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70(6), 510–523 (1988) · DOI · Paper page
  6. Korczowski, L., Congedo, M., Jutten, C.: Single-trial classification of multi-user P300-based Brain-Computer Interface using Riemannian geometry. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1769–1772. IEEE (2015) · DOI
  7. Treder, M.S., Purwins, H., Miklody, D., Sturm, I., Blankertz, B.: Decoding auditory attention to instruments in polyphonic music using single-trial EEG classification. J. Neural Eng. 11(2), 026009 (2014) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krzemiński, D., Michelmann, S., Treder, M., & Santamaria, L.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Santamaria, Lorena
Venue
IFMBE Proceedings
Published
2019-09-25
Pages
1885-1889
ISSN
  • 1433-9277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1680-0737
OpenAlex
W2976838823
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1982622)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
P300, event-related potentials, EEG classification, Riemannian geometry, ensemble learning, covariance matrix, linear discriminant analysis, filter banks, brain-computer interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review