Cited by 31Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationYouth, Politics, and SocietyCitizenship Education and Democracy

Voting at 16 in Practice: A Review of the Austrian Case

Aichholzer, Julian, Kritzinger, Sylvia·2020·Lowering the Voting Age to 16

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-32541-1_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other places, regional party groups and later national parties advocating for a lower voting age gradually adopted the position in their manifestos after seeing implementation by colleagues in other regions, such as in Germany or Austria.

    “In other places, regional party groups and later on national parties advocating for a lower voting age could gradually adopt the position in their respective manifestos, after having seen the implementation by their colleagues in power in other regions of the country, such as in Germany or Austria (Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020;Leininger and Faas, 2020).”

    From Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared (2021) · cites this paper as Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020

  • A number of studies have shown that 16- and 17-year-olds have higher rates of turnout as first-time voters, when given the chance to vote, than 18- and 19-year-olds.

    “A number of studies have shown that the first part of Franklin's (2004) argument holds water; that 16-and 17-year-olds have higher rates of turnout as first time voters, when given the chance to vote, than 18-and 19-year-olds (Bergh, 2013;Zeglovits and Aichholzer, 2014;Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020;Huebner and Eichhorn, 2020;Ødega ˚rd et al., 2020).”

    From Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared (2021) · cites this paper as Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020

  • Austrian voters at the age of 16 and 17 show greater levels of support for democracy and external political efficacy than other voters (Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020).

    “Similarly, Aichholzer and Kritzinger (2020) find that Austrian voters at the age of 16 and 17 show greater levels of support for democracy and external political efficacy than other voters.”

    From Lowering the Voting Age to 16 in Practice: Processes and Outcomes Compared (2021) · cites this paper as Aichholzer and Kritzinger, 2020

  • Aichholzer and Kritzinger (2020) find signs of lasting earlier political socialisation in Austria: for up to seven years following the reform, Austrian 16 and 17-year-olds consistently showed higher levels of external efficacy and were more satisfied with democracy compared to 18-to 20-year-olds.

    “Aichholzer and Kritzinger (2020) find signs of lasting earlier political socialisation in Austria. For up to seven years following the reform of the franchise, Austrian 16 and 17-year-olds consistently showed higher levels of external efficacy and were more satisfied with democracy compared to 18-to 20-year-olds.”

    From Longer-Term Effects of Voting at Age 16: Higher Turnout Among Young People in Scotland (2025) · cites this paper as Aichholzer & Kritzinger, 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aichholzer, J., & Kritzinger, S.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Kritzinger, Sylvia
Venue
Lowering the Voting Age to 16
Published
2019-11-28
Pages
81-101
OpenAlex
W2990498161
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8
FWCI
35.15
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council UK (ES/M010856/1)
  • The Research Council of Norway (Project no. 249687)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth, Politics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
Keywords
youth voting, young voters, voter turnout, political interest, political efficacy, external political efficacy, satisfaction with democracy, Austria, policy implementation, first-time voters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review