Cited by 57Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

Reinforcement Learning in Stock Trading

Open access
Dang, Quang-Vinh·2020·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-38364-0_28

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dang, Q.-V.
Affiliations
Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Corresponding author
Dang, Quang-Vinh
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2019-12-20
Pages
311-322
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W2986670013
Cited by
57
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
reinforcement learning, stock trading, deep reinforcement learning, trading decision-making, stock price prediction, financial markets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review