Closing Words: Quo vadis Manufacturing 4.0
Open accessAbstract
Final words about the contribution of the book are written and some thoughts about the future of Manufacturing 4.0 voiced. The phenomenon of manufacturing 4.0 is a multi-faceted issue that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to be fully understood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fabrisonic has successfully completed all tests required by NASA JPL for flight qualification.
“The company has successfully completed all tests required by NASA JPL for flight qualification [49].”
From Technical, Economic and Societal Effects of Manufacturing 4.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technical, Economic and Societal Effects of Manufacturing 4.0
(2020) · Springer · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46103-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collan, M., & Michelsen, K.-E.
- Affiliations
- Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Collan, Mikael
- ORCID
- Collan, Mikael
- Venue
- Technical, Economic and Societal Effects of Manufacturing 4.0
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 259-261
- OpenAlex
- W3046168045
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Strategic Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- future of manufacturing, Industry 4.0, interdisciplinary approach
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
