Ethical Requirements for AI Systems
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Operationalizing OCAP's Control and CARE's Responsibility and Ethics requires interlacing Indigenous governance protocols directly into AI development infrastructure through value-based requirements engineering that translates Indigenous values into technical specifications.
“Technologically, operationalizing OCAP ® 's Control and CARE's Responsibility and Ethics requires interlacing Indigenous governance protocols directly into AI development infrastructure through value-based requirements engineering that translates Indigenous values into technical specifications (see more on ethical requirements engineering in AI Guizzardi et al. 2020).”
From Preventing AI extractivism: the case for braiding indigenous data justice with ABS for stronger AI data governance (2026) · cites this paper as Guizzardi et al. 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements
Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Schulz, M., & Loewen-Colón, J. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02931-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guizzardi, R., Amaral, G., Guizzardi, G., & Mylopoulos, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
- Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Guizzardi, Renata
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 251-256
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W3023937621
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- link.springer.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- ethical requirements, AI ethics, requirements engineering, requirements analysis, autonomous vehicles, professional codes of conduct, non-functional requirements, functional requirements, ethical compliance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
