Cited by 1Intelligence, Security, War StrategyCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernancePolicing Practices and Perceptions

Introduction: Intelligence-Led Policing, Crime Intelligence and Social Network Analysis

Burcher, Morgan·2020·Social Network Analysis and Law Enforcement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-47771-4_1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intelligence-led policing (ILP) was first implemented in the early 1990s primarily in the UK as a proactive approach to policing intended to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of police organizations.

    “Intelligence-led policing (ILP), first implemented in the early 1990s primarily in the UK, is a proactive approach to policing intended to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of police organizations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Burcher, M.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Burcher, Morgan
Venue
Social Network Analysis and Law Enforcement
Published
2020
Pages
1-27
OpenAlex
W3043863578
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
intelligence-led policing, crime intelligence, social network analysis, law enforcement, intelligence analysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review