Cited by 16Information Systems Theories and ImplementationHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Socio-Technical Design of Hybrid Intelligence Systems – The Case of Predictive Maintenance

Herrmann, Thomas·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-50334-5_20

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrmann, T.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Herrmann, Thomas
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
298-309
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3040952605
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
socio-technical design, predictive maintenance, human-in-the-loop, human operators, sensor data, design guidelines, human-machine coordination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review