Contributions to Improve Accessibility and Usability of Academic Journal Management Systems. Case Study: OJS
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Academic platforms (e.g., journal platforms, learning environments) can be inaccessible.
“Considering that academic platforms (e.g., journal platforms, learning environments) can be inaccessible (Arias-Flores et al., 2020;García-González et al., 2021;Saripudin et al., 2019), it is essential to ensure that checking the validity of information is not more tedious for students with disabilities.”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Arias-Flores et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Considering that academic platforms (e.g., journal platforms, learning environments) can be inaccessible (Arias-Flores et al., 2020; García-González et al., 2021; Saripudin et al., 2019), it is essential to ensure that checking the validity of information is not more tedious for students with…”
- Authors
- Arias-Flores, H., Calle-Jimenez, T., Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Nunes, I. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Indoamérica, Sede Quito (EC)
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Arias-Flores, Hugo
- Venue
- Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 259-264
- ISSN
- 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5365
- OpenAlex
- W3039205852
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- web accessibility, assistive technology, visual impairment, screen readers, Open Journal Systems, journal editorial process, accessible PDF, usability, people with disabilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review