Cited by 1Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationUsability and User Interface Design

Contributions to Improve Accessibility and Usability of Academic Journal Management Systems. Case Study: OJS

Arias-Flores, Hugo, Calle-Jimenez, Tania, Sanchez-Gordon, Sandra, Nunes, Isabel L.·2020·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_35

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academic platforms (e.g., journal platforms, learning environments) can be inaccessible.

    “Considering that academic platforms (e.g., journal platforms, learning environments) can be inaccessible (Arias-Flores et al., 2020;García-González et al., 2021;Saripudin et al., 2019), it is essential to ensure that checking the validity of information is not more tedious for students with disabilities.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arias-Flores, H., Calle-Jimenez, T., Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Nunes, I. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Indoamérica, Sede Quito (EC)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Arias-Flores, Hugo
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2020
Pages
259-264
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W3039205852
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
web accessibility, assistive technology, visual impairment, screen readers, Open Journal Systems, journal editorial process, accessible PDF, usability, people with disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review