Mastery Learning Heuristics and Their Hidden Models
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such a heuristic makes assumptions about student learning that may not hold in practice in all contexts.
“Implicitly, such a heuristic is making assumptions about student learning that may not actually hold in practice in all contexts”
From Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will "AIEd" Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education? (2021) · cites this paper as Doroudi, 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans
Baker, R. S. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [1]Adams, R.P., MacKay, D.J.: Bayesian online changepoint detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.3742 (2007) · arXiv
- [3]Aroian LA Levene H The effectiveness of quality control charts J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1950 45 252 520 529 10.1080/01621459.1950.10501143 · DOI
- [5]Baker RSJD De Bra P Kobsa A Chin D Contextual Slip and prediction of student performance after use of an intelligent tutor User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization 2010 Heidelberg Springer 52 63
- [6]Beck JE Gong Y Lane HC Yacef K Mostow J Pavlik P Wheel-spinning: students who fail to master a skill Artificial Intelligence in Education 2013 Heidelberg Springer 431 440
- [8]Bower GH Application of a model to paired-associate learning Psychometrika 1961 26 3 255 280 10.1007/BF02289796 · DOI
- [9]Cen, H.: Generalized learning factors analysis: improving cognitive models with machine learning. Ph.D. thesis (2009)
- [11]Corbett, A.: Cognitive mastery learning in the act programming tutor. In: AAAI Tech. rep. SS-00-01 (2000)
- [12]Corbett AT Anderson JR Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge User Model. User-Adapt. Interac. 1995 4 4 253 278 10.1007/BF01099821 · DOI · Paper page
- [14]Karush W Dear R Optimal strategy for item presentation in a learning process Manag. Sci. 1967 13 11 773 785 10.1287/mnsc.13.11.773 · DOI
- [15]Kelly, K.M., Wang, Y., Thompson, T., Heffernan, N.T.: Defining mastery: knowledge tracing versus n-consecutive correct responses. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2015)
- [17]Morrison HC The Practice of Teaching in the Secondary School 1926 Chicago University of Chicago Press
- [18]Page ES Continuous inspection schemes Biometrika 1954 41 1/2 100 115 10.2307/2333009 · DOI
- [19]Pelánek, R., Řihák, J.: Experimental analysis of mastery learning criteria. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 156–163 (2017)
- [20]Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505–513 (2015)
- [21]Reynolds MR Jr Stoumbos ZG A CUSUM chart for monitoring a proportion when inspecting continuously J. Qual. Technol. 1999 31 1 87 108 10.1080/00224065.1999.11979900 · DOI
- [22]Salden RJ Aleven V Schwonke R Renkl A The expertise reversal effect and worked examples in tutored problem solving Instr. Sci. 2010 38 3 289 307 10.1007/s11251-009-9107-8 · DOI
- [24]Washburne CW The individual system in Winnetka Elementary Sch. J. 1920 21 1 52 68 10.1086/454876 · DOI
- [25]Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.Y.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature
Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.12920 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Doroudi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Doroudi, Shayan
- ORCID
- Doroudi, Shayan
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 86-91
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- PMC
- PMC7334722
- OpenAlex
- W3040439290
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Keywords
- learning mastery, adaptive learning, heuristics, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, ALEKS, model-based algorithms, optimal policy, skill assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
