Methods for Visualizing Elemental Distribution in Hyperaccumulator Plants
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- van der Ent, A., Purwadi, I., Harris, H. H., Kopittke, P. M., Przybyłowicz, W. J., & Mesjasz-Przybyłowicz, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Venue
- Mineral Resource Reviews
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020-12-08
- Pages
- 197-214
- ISSN
- 2365-0559 (ISSN-L)
- 2365-0567
- OpenAlex
- W3112826393
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Mineral resource reviews (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- hyperaccumulator plants, metalloids, elemental distribution, micro-X-ray fluorescence, PIXE, SEM-EDS, LA-ICP-MS, NanoSIMS, autoradiography, histochemical methods, confocal microscopy, sample preparation, element redistribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review