Cited by 15Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationReflective Practices in Education

Reframing Teacher Professional Identity and Learning

Beijaard, Douwe, Koopman, Maaike, Schellings, Gonny·2022·The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-59533-3_28-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beijaard, D., Koopman, M., & Schellings, G.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Beijaard, Douwe
Venue
The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research
Published
2022
Pages
1-23
OpenAlex
W4226185639
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
23.08
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
Keywords
teacher identity, identity construction, pre-service teachers, professional learning, teacher professional development, teacher well-being, narrative approach, teaching competence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review