Cited by 7Embodied and Extended CognitionGaussian Processes and Bayesian InferenceBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

A worked example of Fokker-Planck-based active inference

Koudahl, Magnus T., de Vries, Bert·2020·Communications in Computer and Information Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-64919-7_4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koudahl, M. T., & de Vries, B.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Koudahl, Magnus T.
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Published
2020
Pages
28-34
ISSN
  • 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0937
OpenAlex
W3112962544
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
active inference, free energy principle, Fokker-Planck equation, equations of motion, Bayesian inference, statistical mechanics, worked examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review