The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AutoCount: Unsupervised Segmentation and Counting of Organs in Field Images
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Models for automated plant phenotyping are typically trained on data collected in a limited number of regions, even for crops grown worldwide such as wheat.
“These models are typically trained on data collected in a limited number of regions, even for crops grown worldwide such as wheat (Madec et al., 2019; Xiong et al., 2019; Ubbens et al., 2020; Ayalew et al., 2020).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Ubbens et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Dobrescu, A., Giuffrida, M.V., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Leveraging multiple datasets for deep leaf counting. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pp. 2072–2079 (2017) · DOI
- Ghosal, S., et al.: A weakly supervised deep learning framework for sorghum head detection and counting. Plant Phenomics 2019, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/1525874 · DOI
- Giuffrida, M.V., Chen, F., Scharr, H., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Citizen crowds and experts: observer variability in image-based plant phenotyping. Plant Methods 14(1), 12 (2018) · DOI
- Giuffrida, M.V., Minervini, M., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Learning to count leaves in rosette plants. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision Problems in Plant Phenotyping (CVPPP) 2015. BMVA Press (2016) · DOI
- Guo, W., et al.: Aerial imagery analysis-quantifying appearance and number of sorghum heads for applications in breeding and agronomy. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1544 (2018) · DOI
- Hasan, M.M., Chopin, J.P., Laga, H., Miklavcic, S.J.: Detection and analysis of wheat spikes using Convolutional Neural Networks. Plant Methods 14(1), 1–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0366-8 · DOI
- Kanezaki, A.: Unsupervised image segmentation by backpropagation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1543–1547. IEEE (2018) · DOI
- Lin, T.-Y., et al.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8693, pp. 740–755. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · DOI · Paper page
- Lu, H., Cao, Z., Xiao, Y., Zhuang, B., Shen, C.: TasselNet: counting maize tassels in the wild via local counts regression network. Plant Methods 1–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0224-0 · DOI
- Madec, S., et al.: Ear density estimation from high resolution RGB imagery using deep learning technique. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 264, 225–234 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Pound, M.P., Atkinson, J.A., Wells, D.M., Pridmore, T.P., French, A.P.: Deep learning for multi-task plant phenotyping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pp. 2055–2063 (2017) · DOI
- Qiongyan, L., Cai, J., Berger, B., Okamoto, M., Miklavcic, S.J.: Detecting spikes of wheat plants using neural networks with laws texture energy. Plant Methods 13(1), 83 (2017) · DOI
- Sadeghi-Tehran, P., Virlet, N., Ampe, E.M., Reyns, P., Hawkesford, M.J.: DeepCount: in-field automatic quantification of wheat spikes using simple linear iterative clustering and deep convolutional neural networks. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01176 · DOI
- Ubbens, J., Cieslak, M., Prusinkiewicz, P., Stavness, I.: The use of plant models in deep learning: an application to leaf counting in rosette plants. Plant Methods 14(1), 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0273-z. https://plantmethods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13007-018-0273-z · DOI
- Ubbens, J.R., Stavness, I.: Deep plant phenomics: a deep learning platform for complex plant phenotyping tasks. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1190 (2017) · DOI
- Valerio Giuffrida, M., Dobrescu, A., Doerner, P., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Leaf counting without annotations using adversarial unsupervised domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (2019) · DOI
- Xiong, H., Cao, Z., Lu, H., Madec, S., Liu, L., Shen, C.: TasselNetv2: in - field counting of wheat spikes with context - augmented local regression networks. Plant Methods (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0537-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Xiong, X., et al.: Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization. Plant Methods 13(1), 104 (2017) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518
“These models are typically trained on data collected in a limited number of regions, even for crops grown worldwide such as wheat (Madec et al., 2019; Xiong et al., 2019; Ubbens et al., 2020; Ayalew et al., 2020).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ubbens, J. R., Ayalew, T. W., Shirtliffe, S., Josuttes, A., Pozniak, C., & Stavness, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ubbens, Jordan R.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 391-399
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W3043292641
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Keywords
- unsupervised segmentation, plant phenotyping, field photographs, sorghum, wheat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review