Cited by 4Technology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Seniors’ Perception of Smart Speakers: Challenges and Opportunities Elicited in the Silver&Home Living Lab

Angelini, Leonardo, Caon, Maurizio, Michielan, Emmanuel, Khaled, Omar Abou, Mugellini, Elena·2021·Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_17

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelini, L., Caon, M., Michielan, E., Khaled, O. A., & Mugellini, E.
Affiliations
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • HES-SO Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Angelini, Leonardo
Venue
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Published
2021
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 2367-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3389
OpenAlex
W3159746645
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in networks and systems (publishedVersion)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
smart speakers, older adults, voice assistants, UTAUT2, technology acceptance, independent living at home, smart lighting, quality of life, living alone, barriers to adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review