Cited by 4Speech and dialogue systemsUsability and User Interface DesignAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Users' error recovery strategies in the interaction with voice assistants (VAs)

Motta, Isabela, Quaresma, Manuela·2022·Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_82

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cowan, B.R., Pantidi, N., Coyle, D., et al.: “What Can i Help You with?”: infrequent users’ experiences of intelligent personal assistants. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 1–12. Association for Computing Machinery, Vienna (2017) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Desmet, P., Overbeeke, K., Tax, S.: Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design. Des. J. 4(1), 32–47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2752/146069201789378496 · DOI
  3. Freund, A.: Word and phrase recognition in speech processing. In: Massaro, W.D. (ed.) Understanding Language - An information-Processing Analysis of Speech Perception, Reading, and Psycholinguistics, pp. 357–390. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA (1975)
  4. Kirschthaler, P., Porcheron, M., Fischer, J.E.: What Can I Say? In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Bilbao, Spain, pp. 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406119 · DOI
  5. Lopatovska, I., Griffin, A.L., Gallagher, K., et al.: User recommendations for intelligent personal assistants. J. Librarianship Inf. Sci. 52(2), 577–591 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619841107 · DOI
  6. Porcheron, M., Fischer, J.E., Sharples, S.: “Do Animals Have Accents?” In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 207–219. ACM, Portland (2017) · DOI
  7. Yarosh, S., Thompson, S., Watson, K., et al.: Children asking questions: speech interface reformulations and personification preferences. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 300–312. ACM, Trondheim (2018) · DOI
  8. Stent, A.J., Huffman, M.K., Brennan, S.E.: Adapting speaking after evidence of misrecognition: local and global hyperarticulation. Speech Commun. 50, 163–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.07.005 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Motta, I., & Quaresma, M.
Affiliations
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Motta, Isabela
Venue
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Published
2021-06-13
Pages
658-666
ISSN
  • 2367-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3389
OpenAlex
W3175178640
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in networks and systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
voice assistants, speech recognition errors, exploratory behavior, speech interfaces, human factors and ergonomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review