The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EEG/MEG Source Reconstruction: Textbook for Electro-and Magnetoencephalography
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is less sensitive to anatomical imprecisions for source reconstruction compared to electroencephalography (EEG)44.”
From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface
Lorach, H., Galvez, A., Spagnolo, V., Martel, F., Karakas, S., Intering, N., Vat, M., Faivre, O., Harte, C., Komi, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5 · Cited by 631
Metadata
- Authors
- Knösche, T. R., & Haueisen, J.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- OpenAlex
- W4313147832
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- EEG source reconstruction, MEG source reconstruction, brain electrical activity, inverse problems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
