The Ethics of Algorithms: Key Problems and Solutions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the foremost concerns is the ethical implications of AI algorithms, particularly in admissions, financial aid provision, and academic evaluations.
“One of the foremost concerns is the ethical implications of AI algorithms, particularly in admissions, financial aid provision, and academic evaluations (Tsamados et al., 2021), also due to a well-documented record of AI bias and problematic algorithmic decision-making.”
From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Tsamados et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Tsamados, A., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Roberts, H., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies Series
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 97-123
- ISSN
- 0921-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 2542-8349
- OpenAlex
- W4211175651
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 90.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical studies series (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- algorithmic ethics, machine learning, algorithmic governance, algorithmic transparency, algorithmic accountability, normative concerns, algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, algorithmic decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
